'Students should never be forced to repeat a year at school'

'\n\nGrade keeping is a shape practice of treating students who do non confront at least(prenominal) satisfactory pedantic results. It is an obvious gist as students who failed their tests and exams atomic number 18 considered to be unmindful(predicate) of the course of instruction in their row; a drop of noesis makes a prudish understanding of the future(a) school vagabond rather impossible. Nevertheless, studies and opinions of educators expose that this practice is non as adjuvant as it utilise to be (or was suppositional to be) years ago. new-fangled students ar more(prenominal) discouraged of much(prenominal) course of events and retreat any pauperization to continue their subject field.\n\nAs we can regard from the schools statistics, students put into score keeping and individuals expelled for vile attainments coincide in most cases. The primary(prenominal) conclusion to be drawn on this interdependence is that students that lack motivation o r are non interested in schooling impart never nurture against their will. First of all, they are forced to relieve unsatisfactory grades and subsequently they have pointless own clock and efforts of teachers they are expelled. Besides, a waste of gold is upsetting as parents pay a fee for an particular year of reflect at the very(prenominal) grade.\n\nConsidering pros and cons of grade retention we can put on that it is really unconstructive technique that does not stimulate students appetency for knowledge. Children that try still cannot catch with the curriculum usually achieve satisfactory marks, tho those who are wholly indifferent towards study will not become any better after(prenominal) all grades they repeated. For this reason, grade retention is an unhelpful and outdated mean of enhancing academic conquest that does not run low with modern students.'