Science and African Metaphysics :: Africa Government Papers

Science and African MetaphysicsIf matchless takes the African situation as a case study, one finds that serious efforts are made for the sake of scientific progress and exploration. However, the results attained are not comparable to the force expended. drop of progress is often attributed to faulty policy formation and execution on the part of African leaders and governments. This essay attempts to shed light on the source of this problem. The heuristic principle I follow holds that the metaphysical preconditioning of brain leads us to approach sensory data in particular ways and, furthermore, influences both our formulation of problems and possible solutions. I note the lapses in African metaphysics and sketch an alternate metaphysics which I hope will inaugurate a new African system of thought.INTRODUCTIONThe distinctions Between metaphysics As consistency Of Beliefs and metaphysics as a Tool Of Exploration shall serve as the origination of this essay. The essay would revie w and highlight some important characteristics of metaphysics as the approximately fundamental science and the basic tool of exploration. This claim, among others, has incidentally been the root of around harsh and destructive criticisms against metaphysics as a quest in futility. (1) These doubts and criticisms nonetheless the understanding of metaphysics as the catalyst of scientific progress and exploration would be upheld in this essay. This is borne from the insight that scientific progress is sustained by the jazz up to go beyond each attainable results. To stimulate this urge, whether real, hypothetical or even imaginary would be identified in this essay as the pride of metaphysics. Yet not all quest for quantitative and qualitative scientific growth based on this urge is rewarded with the same add of progress. If the African situation is taken take on a case study, one discovers that serious and consistent efforts are made within this area to ask questions that go beyo nd the possible limits of attainable results. Yet the curious energy expanded within the African context in terms of bet for scientific answer to challenging problems does not always seem to establish yield commensurate results as comparable to what is obtainable elsewhere. A given(p) question then is this Why is a quest sustained by the urge towards breaking new grounds fundamentally the same, but the results in terms of tangible or recognisable results remain at disagreement?TWO MODELS OF METAPHYSICAL INQUIRYTwo models shall be put up for reflection - the science oriented model and the mythological model.