Genetic Modification of Human Beings is unaaceptable it strips the Research Paper

Genetic Modification of valet Beings is unaaceptable it strips the benevolent race of individuality and human rights - Research Paper ExampleThis takes place through exercise of DNA in different ways to adjust to the intended purpose. This has made it possible to put traits of around any organism (Institute of Science, Technology and Public Policy 1). Most of the organisms are produced in large quantities afterward the process of transformation and improvement is done. On the other hand, the process has made it possible to create foods, pesticides, cells, tissues, and variety meat (Uzogara 180). The technique has been used mainly to budge or alter the plants and animals we use today as food. On the other hand, thither has been advancement of genetic adaption in humans. In human, it is usually done to change non-functional or malfunctioning genes (Isasi, Nguyen and Knoppers 2). Moreover, such genes are manipulated or supplemented with health genes. In human, two categories o f genetic adaptation are involved. These categories include somatic and germline modification (Isasi et al. 2). In somatic gene therapy, a gene or a gene element is introduced into a tissue or organ in a human subject with the purpose of curing a disease (Isasi et al. 2). This process does not alter the genetic social organisation of future generations, as the altered genes do not exist in sexual eggs or sperms. On the other hand, there is germline gene therapy. This process involves the introduction of gene into germline cells (Isasi et al. 2). As a result, there is heritable changes and thus alters the resulting offspring (Gold and Carbone 1). For this reason, this technique has generated a serious debate due to its implementation in humans. Genetic Modification of Human Beings is unacceptable it strips the human race of degage choices, treats human as a commodity, loss of uniqueness and individuality, and leads to change magnitude inequalities. Proofs Genetic modification lea ds to interference of freedom to make choices. This means that such soulfulness has no subdue making free choices in relation to the modified trait. This makes its inevitable for the person to avoid expressing such trait. The person who initiated the modification process controls the human future (Resnik and Vorhaus 5). For example, if the person is given the gene for specific skill such as football, he or she has no choice but to pay off a footballer. Moreover, the process limits the options of the person who is modified by limiting their scope of behaviors and emotional state plans (Resnik and Vorhaus 5). This means that the life choices of such people are limited. For example, if there is a modification of a person height to increased height, such a person cannot become a jockey. Additionally, the persons ability to make free choices is interfered with as the process increase parental expectations and demands (Resnik and Vorhaus 5). This means that their parents in a large pe rcentage inherently limit their destiny. This is because such person life is artificially molded in the way that they could not film chosen (Seck 1). For example, a person with a gene for football talent will be on a lower floor pressure from the parent to become a footballer. Secondly, genetic modification treats human as commodities. This is seen through children arising from the modification process. Such children are treated like products to be designed, perfected, manipulated, and controlled (Resnik and Vorhaus 8). This goes against the basic principle of having children as gifts. Therefore, the parents exercise control over their children to fulfill their own desires. The parent believes that this is possible through genetic control of their