Observation and Coaching Essay

Much closely parley depends on the resonance among the two parties. As Clutterback explains in his title Creating a Coaching Culture, the quality of a relationship is determined by the rapport between the two parties in it. A inviolable rapport implies a healthy relationship and therefore a learning talk. Observations of people in conversation quite a little reveal a long deal about the rapport between them and therefore an insight into the relationship they sh ar. The tell-tell signs will be the body language of the parties in conversation as well as the brief moments of silence they sh ar as part of their conversation.After all(a) 55% of communication is done via our body language and nervus facialis saying (Albert Mehrabian beaver Practice in Performance Coaching). Though this task infallible the observation of the conversation of just a meeting, I must contract that I had to observer a digit of groups in a come of oscilloscopes before focusing on one. As I carri ed out these observations, the variations bring together with the literature on the subject brought out very many insights into the capability of conversation and the enormity of the focus necessary, as a coach, to execute successfully, a learning dialogue.Staying in promise is the ultimate goal and even when spillage down a slippery slope it is you who would meet to determine how further down the slide goes. The Setting In my observations, I discovered that tender environment in which the conversation takes place can subscribe to a great deal to do with the nature of the conversation. Cafes make for very speedy light hearted conversations without much pause or reflection from either parties whilst pose and restaurants allowed for a slower pace of conversation with lots of moments of silence presumably accompanied by deep thought and reflection.The mise en scene also shows temperament to certain types of body language expressed by the parties in conversation. peradvent ure it is to do with the pace of the conversation or perhaps the social attributes of the environment. hatful I observe in parks and restaurants tend to demonstrate more than than closeness and rapport through their body language than those in cafes would. at that place were longer moments of eye contact, heavier body contact and more varied facial expressions.This is by no means a scientific conclusion on the impact of the conversational setting on the conversation we sustain as people but however a cue to pay great attention to the setting of a coaching session with a coachee. I would imagine, the first footmark in taking control of the conversation is allowing the setting to be conducive to the objective of the coaching session. As I pay back noticed in the brief observations I have had, the right setting will allow for the right expressions from both parties and therefore facilitate the insight of the conversation.The danger however is to ignore the casual attribution s which may then rig out from the cultural dispositions of me as a coach and from the coachee as an individual towards their actions in relation to the environment. Casual Attributions in Conversation The reason why I would like to discuss this at this point is because it plays a lot in our reading, perception and judgement of conversation and particularly body language. The casual attribution opening discusses the reason for the judgement we make on why a person behaves or behaved the way they did.Psychological research on attribution has primarily studied the cause of an early(a) persons deportment. Attributions are ubiquitous in everyday life and as such are easily over carryed in our everyday conversations. As a coach, I believe it is very of the essence(predicate) to be acutely aware of the attributions we may place on a coachees behaviour or reactions and reach to keep an open and non-judgemental mind. This will allow our conversations to be much more forthcoming. Heider (1958) purports that perceivers (a role we would occupy as coaches) seek to attribute fleeting behaviour to stable dispositions.They tend to trace action to dispositions of the actor. In other words, a coach power be caught up in making judgements on the actions of the coachee based on the knowledge the coach has gained on the coachee as a person. This tendency was designated by Ross and Nisbett (1991) the fundamental attribution error. When I reflected on my discernment to attribution, I noticed that I have a tendency to run towards single attribution tendencies. As a result to be a go coach it necessitates me to actively seek to balance this.Conversation is a two way process and therefore, awareness of the attributions that the coachee might be dispose to will be vital. Sometimes the coachees action might be a reaction to your action(s) as a coach. It will be important to understand the coachees attribution tendencies thereby enabling you not all to manage your expressions (body language) but also to fully understand any actions by your coachee. Millers research in 1984 provided evidence that understanding of cultures is compulsive in understanding the underlying reactions in conversation.Cultural psychology separates the cultures into individualistic and collectivist with both groups showing different tendencies of attribution. I therefore determine understanding your coachees background will be an important spirit towards achieving a learning conversation. Body Language and Rapport Alebert Merhabians theory suggests that when people have a rapport between them, they tend to have mirror body language (Best Practice in Perfomance Coaching chirrup Wilson p129). This was explicit in my observations. I could tell when both parties exhibit mirrored body language such as leaning towards each other and laughing in tandem.This was a clear sign of the rapport between the parties, a significant indication of the intensity of the conversation. It is my beli ef that a good rapport between two parties in a conversation will make for easy audience enabling the listener to move up the levels of listening (Carol Wilson p21). The rapport between the two will aid in cocooning the conversation and allow for very minimal distraction. As a coach the objective will be to aim for intuitive listening thus developing a good rapport with the coachee is a step in the right direction.As Carol Wilson explains in her book Best Practice in Performance Coaching coaching only really happens when we listen at higher levels i. e. intuitive listening. On the other hand, secernate body language in a conversation can be indicative of a negative rapport between the parties in conversation. This might lead to a strained and unproductive conversation. Sometimes, it is necessary to stop and look at the underlying factors for the lack of rapport as opposed to forcing the space by actively trying to mirror your coachees body language.This can at times go right do wn to the setting or environment or possibly the casual attributions tendencies of both individuals. Summary & shutdown Much has been written about communication and conversation. It remains a compelling tool in coaching and therefore the greater the understanding we have as coaches, the better we will be able to use the conversation tool in executing our duties. In this report, I have looked at the impact on communication and conversation of three different aspects and seen how I can better prepare myself as a coach.My observations were a great cue towards helping me understanding communication. To attain my ultimate goal of perpetually remaining in control, there are a good number of things to take into consideration. A lot in this report has focussed on the non-verbal aspects of the communication process. During the observation, I remained a good distance from the target group and therefore could not match the verbal communication to the non-verbal patterns that I observed. I am intrigued to know what the relation between the two will be. be words a reflection of feelings?Are we more likely to control our physical expressions to avoid causing a scene in a public place? Are we mostly acutely aware of our surround? These are questions to which we might have no answers but can be used as important guides in analysing and controlling conversation. I have learned a great deal from these observations to make me a better coach. It is very important to understand and interpret non verbal cues in conversation paying particular attention to our own personal attributions as coaches that we might bring into the relationship.