PeopleSoft vs. Oracle Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

PeopleSoft vs. Oracle - Research Paper Examples, The acquisition of one company by another that is execute not by coming to an agreement with the target companys counseling, but by lossdirectly tothe companys shareholders or fighting to replace management in order to get the acquisition approved (Investopedia, 2012).The hostile takeover bid of the company was eccentric due to the fact that the company had no engross in the product or services that PeopleSoft offered. Instead Oracle was solely posted in the customers of PeopleSoft. The plan of Oracle was to convert all the customers of PeopleSoft into its EPR system. Another unusual aspect of the original offer was that it was only 6% above the market value of the firm. Typically most hostile takeover bids are at least(prenominal) 20% above the market value. It seemed as if Oracle was taking a huge gamble in this takeover offer since the firm was not going to utilize the intellectual property of PeopleSoft to its advantage. The plan of Oracle was to increase its market share by eliminating its top competitor.The conditions that needed to be met for the independent boards of directors to determine if the change of the company was in the best interest of the company was whether the hostile takeover bid maximizes the shareholders wealth. The initial offer was so low that there was no debate for the company to accept it since the bid was undervalued in comparison with other hostile takeovers of publicly traded companies. Even though the primary focus of the board should be the shareholders, the interest of other stakeholders of the company such as the employees and the customers were also important. Based on Oracles plan some of the negative consequences included mass ignition system of employees due to downsizing and a deterioration of customer relations.PeopleSoft had in its bylaws a poison pill to protect itself against hostile takeovers. The poison pill was a bylaw that utter that the company had the a bility to release more shares in order to dilute